Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of Women's Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verloo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and the European Union

Mieke Verloo

Radboud University, Nijmegen

The European Union (EU), a pioneer in gender equality policies, is moving from predominantly attending to gender inequality, towards policies that address multiple inequalities. This article argues that there are tendencies at EU level to assume an unquestioned similarity of inequalities, to fail to address the structural level and to fuel the political competition between inequalities. Based upon a comparison of specific sets of inequalities (class, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation and gender), this article explores where and how structural and political intersectionality might be relevant. It argues that a ‘one size fits all’ approach to addressing multiple discrimination is based on an incorrect assumption of sameness or equivalence of the social categories connected to inequalities and of the mechanisms and processes that constitute them. Focusing on similarities ignores the differentiated character and dynamics of inequalities. It also overlooks the political dimension of equality goals. Moreover, it has become clear that attention to structural mechanisms and to the role of the state and the private sphere in reproducing inequalities is much needed. The final part of the article presents constructive ideas for a more comprehensive way of addressing multiple inequalities.

Key Words: class • diversity mainstreaming • ethnicity • European Union • gender • gender mainstreaming • intersectionality • race • sexual orientation

European Journal of Women's Studies, Vol. 13, No. 3, 211-228 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1350506806065753


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
C. Essers and Y. Benschop
Muslim businesswomen doing boundary work: The negotiation of Islam, gender and ethnicity within entrepreneurial contexts
Human Relations, March 1, 2009; 62(3): 403 - 423.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of European Social PolicyHome page
A. E. Woodward
Too late for gender mainstreaming? Taking stock in Brussels
Journal of European Social Policy, August 1, 2008; 18(3): 289 - 302.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SOC POLHome page
J. Jenson
Writing Women Out, Folding Gender In: The European Union "Modernises" Social Policy
Soc. Pol., June 1, 2008; 15(2): 131 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Philosophy of the Social SciencesHome page
S. Walby
Complexity Theory, Systems Theory, and Multiple Intersecting Social Inequalities
Philosophy of the Social Sciences, December 1, 2007; 37(4): 449 - 470.
[Abstract] [PDF]